Does latest police shooting show why auditor is needed?

| 45 Comments

Stephen Willis 1.jpgLess than a week after the Fresno City Council approved an independent police auditor, another shooting has Fresno police on the hot seat. Officers say the 23-year-old man drew a gun and fired at them early Saturday in southeast Fresno before they fired 35 rounds back at him, killing him.

Friends and family are questioning the police response in this case.

Here is what the article says occurred before the shooting:

Officers were investigating a disturbance and had detained several people when a car sped past them into the nearby apartment complex, he said.

The car struck an entry gate, screeching its tires as it continued through the parking lot, and two officers went into the complex to investigate. They found the car parked and a suspect standing near the trunk, holding a holster that contained a handgun later found to be a .38-caliber revolver.


The young man's father said his son had gone target-shooting with friends Friday and was just getting his gun out of the trunk to take it back into his home.

Stephen Willis -- a Buchanan High School graduate who was studying at ITT Technical Institute -- was the fifth person so far this year to be shot by Fresno police officers, Police Chief Jerry Dyer said. The shooting was the second such fatal confrontation this year.

Will the new police auditor help restore community confidence in cases like this? Two other incidents earlier this year -- the previous fatal shooting and a videotaped incident that shows two officers beating a homeless man -- also helped build community support for the position.

45 Comments

Let me see if I got this straight: A guy is doing tequila shots with his girlfriend, drives while under the influence, is stopped by the PD, pulls a gun on the officers & is shot. (If there is any lesson here, it is, that alcohol makes you extremely STUPID!).

What should have the officers done? Wait for an OK from the IPA before acting? Their life was on the line. There wasn’t time to consider all the politically correct ramifications before acting. The only thing the IPA is going to do is make the PD officers hesitant in potentially life-threatening situations.

He was driving erratically right by officers doing property damage and then shoots at officers and they are supposed to just stand there. If he just taking his gun out of the trunk then he wouldn't have fired shots. Maybe the cops should just please everyone and shoot themselves. If its justified is just is and this appears to be.

You need the auditor. But not having investigating authority does not good. What was it this time 32 shots to 1? Which of the 32 shots killed the guy? The first, the 10th or the 32th? How did they miss the girl? Whos gona pay to fix all the bullets holes in the apartment complex?

Look fellows maybe this guy fired a shot, maybe he didn't. As for the auditor, somebody has to find out why the cops in this town need so many bullets to take down a perp. Something aint't right and hasn't been for a long time. Life threatening situation for the cops? Maybe, maybe not. Lets hear someone else beshide the cops confirm it. It is pretty clear now that in Fresno, every situration involving the police is life threatening.

I think every employee with the Fresno Police Department should take a one week furlough at the same time. Let Fresnans go it alone. The public does not seem to understand what the police are up against nor how often they put their lives on the line. A one week furlough will give the public a small taste of reality; perhaps they won't automatically damn the police every time they defend their own lives. Perhaps also the public will be less anxious to allow the government to take away their 2nd Amendment rights.

I am truly sorry for the family's loss. However, what do you expect the police to do when they are shot at...wage their fingers and say, "Now don't do that sonny?"

Right on Kim. Even if 1 shot could have killed him Miro do you want to be the one to walk over to him and chance it that he still has the power to kill you. They are trained to diffuse the situation and protect the public as well as themselves. They have no way of telling what they are up against. If someone has drugs in their system they can be quite strong. They could shoot once then leave them lay there until the lose enough blood to die if that would make you happy.

"I think every employee with the Fresno Police Department should take a one week furlough at the same time." Being glib about it is of no help.
"It is pretty clear now that in Fresno, every situration involving the police is life threatening." Yes, to law enfrorcement as well as suspects.

Even more reason to have an auditor. You folks think it will benifit the cops as well??

If the facts are in, and Cops are seen as justified by the auditor, it further reinforces our suppot of them, right?

I think it will.

the young man should have never put himself in this situation in the first place. if you don't want to be in a confrontation with police, then don't give them a reason to confront you. it's as simple as that.

if i'm speeding, guess what, i shouldn't be surprised if i get pulled over. if I have a gun and i'm holding it while a police officer is telling me to drop it, then guess what, i shouldn't cry foul if i get shot. this is the way it is.

instead of the public pointing fingers at law enforcement, take responsiblity for your actions. taking responsibility is something that nobody takes upon themselves anymore.

I think the city of Fresno should have a make believe day. All of the auditor supporters could sign up and pretend to show us how a police department is run for 24 hours. Each volunteer would be video taped beginning with the dispatch and available for viewing on the internet. The price would be a waiver of any rights to legal representation as a consequence of their conduct. This June would be perfect.

Are we supposed to believe Police shoot people because they like to fire their guns...hence more bullets. Maybe I'm wrong but your not supposed to be driving around with a loaded gun...Right?...even in the trunk? If he did indeed fire even one shot that would mean it was loaded already.What's an Auditor bring to the table to solve this mystery? A pass on decision making and responsibility for the Mayor and the Chief?

We are all going over board some on our comments. The fact is, we will have an independent review of the Police Dept. I think it is a good thing.

We are all subject to some kind of independent review, comment and action no matter what we do personnally or at work and the department should not be any different. The fact of the matter is that the argument for or against is now mute.

I am hoping this all works well and everybody gets what they really want a fair deal and a fair representation of facts and actions taken.

I really don't think the Chief jumped on this bandwagon because he didn't think it was needed and we aren't the first City of our size to have independent review.

In college I got nailed for attempting to compare the second law of thermal dynamics to social structure and loss of authority. This idea had it been implemented then would have been the stuff of my opus, thank God it didn't then, too bad it is now. This formula for defusing mob rule with smoke and mirrors will be short lived. They who cry out to change our imperfectly free republic are trained to be perpetually dissatified. Our government to them should be a system so void of traditional structure that it ceases to have meaning. Origin will have no value, and the lights of culture will get imperceptibly dimmer each generation.

Bart ease-up with all the gloom and doom.

This is the IPA, nothing to do with thermal dynamics, social structure, loss authority, mob rule, smoke and mirrors, a dimmer generation, etc...

Let's move on.

Are you serious?..."Let's move on." Is this sycophancy or are you a true believer?

I knew this person personaly for a very long time....What the police did was stupid and wrong! Did they really have to shoot so many times at one person? Was it completley necesary? Maybe they knew they messed up and had to kill him to hide there screw up...Cops are nothing but meanies that like using athority in order to murder. Fresno Police are the biggest gang in this city, and they represent there gang with matching uniforms and badges. I have no respect for cops at all in Fresno, NONE of them. And you all can hate me for all i care...but if you knew the person...you would know what happend to him was completley wrong. Even if he was drunk or something...one cop got grazed, and he is crying about it....and yet the person they shot got Killed. Is that fare? Police will always try hiding the truth of things...why do you think they make so many news confrences...they need someone to believe their sorry behinds. To bad me and many other people dont believe any of their words...

I can't believe some of the comment people are leaving. I think Bart has it right in a Non bias statement. I have a cousin that works for Fresno P.D. I also grew up with Steven. I do have this question for Mr. Jerry Dyer. Why are you hiding the names of the of the police that shot Steven. We haven't heard anything about them. And how can you justify the killing of a 23 year old man. You can't justify it. You where not there, Mr. Dyer. The fact is are Police are running scared right now, and are trying to use that as a Justification for their wrong doings. I wish that these Cops would step forward and admit to their mistakes.

Arielle - "Even if he was drunk or something...one cop got grazed, and he is crying about it....and yet the person they shot got Killed." Are you serious with that?? The cop got grazed and yet had no justification, according to you, to kill the guy that shot him?? At what point would it have been alright...only when instead of being grazed he was at least mortally wounded could he then kill your friend?? That's about the most asinine statement I've every seen!!!

you know what people i knew this guy. im friends with his 18 year old brother. i knew stephen through jeff. stephen was a good guy. i saw this on the news and went into shock saying "is that really stephen!!??" and it was. for one i say that fresno pd were doing there job if he fired off a shot at them. but EVERY SINGLE PART OF MY BODY says that fresno pd needs to calm there shit down and not be so damn trigger happy. seriously you guys saw them beating that bum right?????? EXACTLY!!!! they probably rolled up on stephen hella fast and didnt even give him a chance to turn around. i mean if you were him and they rolled up to you and said drop it and before you could they started shooting. WHAT WOULD YOU DO STAND THERE AND GET SHOT EVEN THO THERE COPS????? YOU HAVE RIGHT TOO!!! THATS NOT STEPHEN AND HE ABSOLUTELY NEVER WOULD HAVE DONE IT LIKE THEY SAID HE DID. TIP STEVE

There are apparently friends of the young man who died during this incident who are reading here. Some of us remember what it was like to be twenty-three years old. On a good day we barely stayed standing on the wire, it was hard to conform. Young people look out at the society they live in and see hyprocracy everywhere, that's good because by God it is there. On the other hand adulthood brings requirements that are perceived to be ambiguous as best. Young men and women are not perfect and resent the reminder by folks they know who say one thing and do another. This is why it is important for young adults to seek out the trustworthy mentor they deserve. Likewise better established adults in neighborhoods should recognize when they have been tapped out to play that role, it is life saving.

I say to Steven's friends that you are better off in a world with police than without. What you have experienced is that chaos will visit you occasionally during the course of your lifetime. I will always leave you with significantly less than what you possessed before it arrived. Anyone who knows this better than a police officer will also bear a personal tragedy.

Oh Brother...

He may have been a good guy but he made some poor decisions that cost him his life. With an alcolhol level of .29 he was out driving a vehicle erratically endangering other lives, maybe even your own family members so that with the firing of a gun the police were justified in stopping him from hurting anyone else. Im sick of the families that have relatives that commit crimes crying foul and blaming the police for their relatives stupid decisions. Nobody needs to know the names of the officers so they can commit vigilante justice. I am sorry for the families loss. People need to get a clue if they are breaking the law and endangering lives of ionnocent people they will get shot.

'masta j"...the .29 alcohol level...was that really Stephen? Also can you cut the "Gangsta Rap" and speak english...I think I kind of understand what your saying but would never give you a job.

I think the city should counter-sue the people who are filing. They will think twice from cashing-in on something that blatently seems justified (from law enforcements' point of view).

ok first of all brian murray gangsta rap? seriously?this is a blog about an unfortunat event and if your gna be a s*** talker then theres no point for you to be here. you think im a complete idiot. i KNOW he was WAY over legal limit to drive. i KNOW he had a gun. but think about it. they shot him 14 times and 4 of which were in the back. you call that justice? if you do then your a pos yourself. ya he could have crashed into someone and killed them while driving.. but he DIDNT. and they reporters said they THINK!!!!! THINK that he fired a shot but couldnt prove it. so from my point of view there were wrong doings from both parties. gangsta rap? seriously your a loser. and btw idiot the loaded gun in the trunk was cuase he was at the gun range that day. so cut your stupidity. thanks.

and give me a job? i wouldnt leave mine to work for somebody who confusing common english and "gansta rap". and the masta j was what he called me. so that is sentimental value to me as his friend.

I would agree that the number of shots were probably excessive but you have more than one officer on scene trying to protect theirself, partner and public resulting in more shots fired. If he would have just followed police orders we wouldn't be having this dialogue. Ifg he was shot in the back then he was trying to run instead of laying down his weapon. If you are approached by officers just do what you are told and they won't shoot you. Dont challenge them or run. They can not let someone with a weapon go loose on the streets.

I read the above comments about the police killing a drunk, erratic driver who may or may not have discharged a gun. Taken into a courtroom, none of these offenses would have asked for the death penalty. I hesitate to make any judgment because I was not a witness to the happening. But I am witness to the comments that have been posted here. And some of them are nauseating. We, the more civilized folk are not interested in the authors of OK Corral genre venting their choler at each other. I subscribe to Albert Schweitzer's dictum that "Life is inviolable." And then we have self-preservation to consider. The latter seems to get a greater workout here in the Valley than it does at most other places. Is it not part of police training to effectively disable, but not execute a suspect? I saw a news item when a would be assassin of the late Pope must have been close enough to see the prelate's white of the eye; yet the Italian police got the man without shooting the culprit. Are the carabiniere suicidal or just a little less trigger-happy?

Again in defense of the police officers who protect my family. There is no comparison between what our officers face daily and those in Europe. There is no care about human life here and I won't persecute officers for doing their job. I am sure if they could take someone down and know they wouldn't get up and kill them they would do that but not knowing what the person is capable of they are trained to shoot to kill to protect themselves and the public. It was well said that if you pull a gun on a cop you will be killed if you don't follow their commands. That is what the order to drop it is for. It isn't murder if they don't comply but is suicide by cop.

masta j or whoever you are...thanks for expanding on your reasoning and defining it in plain english...or what passes for it these days.Sorry your friend made a mistake but glad you're working for...somebody.Can you drive around with a loaded gun in your trunk?Yes.Is it legal or prudent...I don't know.It proved fatal for your friend and I'd unload my gun if someone pulled one on me...wouldn't you?

"Dizzy"...maybe they were trying to shoot the gun out of his hand and he moved or maybe they were trying to free up court space or just maybe they wanted to go home to their families alive.What would you have done under the circumstances that have been described...a split second can mean life or death.Easy to pass judgement sitting in your comfy chair sipping euro-brews and i find your depicting the "Italian Police" as more capable nauseating and more of your euro-superiority complex.It must be unbearable for you here in this country of misfits when you come from the "Land of Salt".

Jackie...this being shot in the back could have resulted from something other than him running away from "The Death Squad".Multiple guns fired from different angles and his own gyrations could have produced this.This is a tragedy for all involved and the bad choices this fellow made caused this...not the police.The vigil tonight at Stoney Brook...do you think anyone will be there to support the officers whose lives have been turned upside down by this or will it be an anti-law enforcement rally or just a bunch of people leaving flowers and lighting candles? My guess is they(the officers involved) will need some follow up help to deal with this personally and publicly.

I have a question. Did the police identify themselves? In a pitch black apartment complex parking lot, not a great part of town, someone yells at you about your gun and starts firing when you move. We all have the right to own a gun and protect ourselves. He was drunk. What went through his mind at that instant? One small mistake or indecision in that instant cost him his life.

How many people here think he would have fired at police officers if he knew they were police officers? I don't think he was that kind of guy. His crime was driving drunk. It doesn't say whether or not the police pulled up in their car with lights flashing. It suggests they snuck up on him on foot. I sympathize with the police and how tough their job is, but we're not all Bulldog gang members. Perhaps if they had ducked behind a car, identified themselves, they wouldn't have had a need to "fear for their lives." One mistake leads to another and in an instant of bad judgment on both sides someone's son and brother is dead.

Scot... in trying to sound compassionate and insightful you damn the police officers for doing their job.Get real.

I , and the US media thought that the would be assassin , in close proximity to the Pope, was a matter of life and death. Jackie Krage , are you implying that the Pope's life counted less because it happened in Europe. I don't know how well you know Europe; but you can take my word for it, Europeans bleed. And European killers are as deadly as American killers. In fact when I was still attending Clovis City Council meetings, the Clovis Police changed over to the Austrian made Glock, which is the preferred weapon by law enforcement and many military. And European police officers are not there to play "cops and robbers" and they are protecting the citizens no less than a Fresno cop. Xenophobia is what it says it is, a phobia.

I cannot understand why you drag your brother into so many issues.

A policeman makes a traffic stop for something as innocent as a broken tail light. He walks up to the car, gets shot and ends up in the morgue. His family is without a Dad. It happens often enough that there is a special procedure for approaching a car, dashboard cameras are rolling and they call dispatch to tell them what they are doing. A simple traffic stop can mean death. Now in this situation, these cops were already at a disturbance, tensions are already high. A car speeds by them (unusual most people slow down when they see a cop), slams into a gate and screeches through residentail parking stalls. Something isn't right. Outnumbered cops from the first disturbance have to split their numbers to go see what is up to find a guy pulling a gun out of the back of his car. To do what? Is he part of the first disturbance? Was he planning to use the gun on the cops? Is this a domestic disturbance and is he planning on killing someone else? Wouldn't be the first time. These cops have a situation. Drunk, he may not have handled the gun in a conservative way, who knows. He may have accidentally discharged the gun because he was drunk, who knows... All the cops know is that a guy acting irradically is now armed. They have no way knowing if he was dangerous or not; although drunk holding a loaded gun is dangerous in my book. Now if a routine traffic stop can put a cop in the morgue, I'm sure this situation proves to be even more threatening. Seriously, can you blame the cops for reacting like they did? Is this a tragedy? Yes it is. Stephen Willis was likely a nice guy but he made some bad choices. Driving drunk is illegal. Driving with a loaded gun in a car is illegal without a permit. Handling a loaded gun when you are drunk is plain stupid. I look at his sweet face and think about what his family is going through and think what a horrible, horrible, shame. I think given the same situation, I would have shot him too.

Three or more dead policeman in Pittsburgh last night that were responding to a domestic dispute.Will an IA determine if their deaths were justified?In Fresno...The mayor ,city mgr.,and police chief are shifting the responsibility of their job, at taxpayer expense,to satisfy a handful of cry babies.That's leadership?

given the same situation you would have shot him too??? you wouldnt have waited to see if he even aimed it at you first before you put 14 rounds in him??? you wouldnt have stood behind your car aimed and ready saying "put the gun down" with your POLICE LIGHTS FLASHING??? stephen was basically on the verge of falling asleep at his trunk being 3 times the legal limit. im sry kim but if you ever find yourself grabbing something from your car and looking down a loaded barrel youd feel like shit for saying what you just said. or at least id hope so. TAXPAYERS SPEND MILLIONS for technology to prevent these situations. ever heard of non deadly force. where were the beanbag shotguns?? those would have put him down. where were the shooting tazers??? those would have put him down too and shoot up to 25 ft. CLEARLY (unless the cops were both idiots) stephen was DRUNK DRUNK. they should have done less immediate responding and more assesing the situation.

I have another viewpoint on a police 'board'.
Have a citizen review, like 5 people. Get them from the same list as jury duty. If called, you spend one week on a review board 'as needed'.
Any 3 out of 5 vote gets minimal results. Any 'unanimous' vote has legal ramifications, such as firing or prosecuting an officer. Their decision can only be over-ridden by a Superior Court judge.
The concept is really to get average folks very involved with seeing the daily stresses and difficulties faced by our Fresno Police. This review board may also allow for 'ride alongs' so they get a first hand view.
I think the average Fresno citizen needs more 'connection' to our police. There are a lot of VERY good cops out there being trashed over some very tough calls.
Get involved...

Brian, I was be being very real. My question was: did the cops identify themselves? Did the guy know who was shouting at him? Put yourself in his position for a second. What went through his mind at that instant? Self defense? Shoot at the cops? He had no reason to shoot at the cops...he wasn't a gang member, he wasn't a parolee, he wasn't facing a third strike, he wasn't a bad guy.

I said I sympathize with the police and how hard their job is. I admire their bravery and I also feel saddened when the effects of the job cause them to over react.....but I imagine it's part of the territory.

We're on a rural property and my wife has the Sheriff's Deputy listed on her phone. On one occasion at night when she was alone and nervous about some car activity he came by to make a drive through. He drove through the property with his red and blue lights flashing to identify himself.

We're a gun totin' society but we're not all gang members. How do the police know the difference? If cops snuck up on you on your property and you pulled out your gun....should you be shot because you're holding a gun when you don't know who's out there?

For the record....if the cops identify themselves and the guy takes shots at them, then yes, shoot him. If you're getting pulled over and you decide to run....then you get what's coming to you when they catch you. Those idiots take stupid to a whole new level, but this wasn't an automatic situation and I think the death could have been prevented. They just didn't know who they were dealing with and didn't try to find out. That's my opinion.

Well "masta j" I was not there was I? I don't believe you were there either so you are making some assumptions that you aren't qualified to make. I responded to what the article said. I have no way of knowing if what they wrote is true either. However, based on the information we were presented with, then yes I would have shot him too. In any situation in which I believe it is shoot or be shot, I will pick me(and my family) every single time. Is it harsh? Yes. Is it correct in all cases? In some cases no. Is it the truth? Yes. It's true for many people; it is just indelicate to say so.

You can not make the assumptions you make unless you were there. I don't think the details have been made public yet. How do you know Stephen was almost falling asleep drunk? I had a friend, a race car driver, that could be "over the top shit-faced" and drive and function better than most sober people. Everyone is different. How do you know the police didn't call out to drop the gun? Maybe they only saw it when he raised it.. then it is already to late to stop and talk about it. The article made it sound like they followed his car on foot. In that case there were no lights to flash. It is not so black and white as you make it sound. I was speaking to what the article said and based on the article my opinion stands. That does not mean it is still not a tragedy but given a stranger with a gun acting outside normal behavior... I will still choose to go back to my children alive every time. I don't have to apologize for that and I don't fault the police for that either.

Maybe the police should have voice activated weapons that only unlock after a certain number of voice commands."We are the Police,Drop the gun,one thousand one,one thousand two,one thousand three,last chance, we really mean it".

you bring up very good points. the article makes it seem like they followed him on foot which was unfair to stephen in the sense that there would have been no lights to signify who it was approaching him. i mean 3 times the legal limit is pretty dang drunk even for an alchoholic. i do understand your reasons for what your saying. they make perfect sense. altho i would approach the situation not aiming to OVERKILL the suspect. if the situation calls for it then yes i would have shot instead of being shot. but i would HAVE NOT shot 35 times for a single being. i mean are they soo unconfident in there marksmanship skills? that they need to unload then reload after hes already down?

and i PREY that you dont/didnt let your friend drive "over-the-top-shitfaced" cuase that would be pretty F****** foolish of you.

Just one day a year, thats all I asking for. Show us how to do it. Auditor supporters, LE armchair quarterbacks, and you who have shuttered the cottage windows in anticipation of the Army of God, all of you. Pretend to be police officer for one shift. Start a petition right here so you can take a stand publically, who's first?

My friend drove on private land on a dirt racetrack. The only person he could have killed was himself. Friends of Stephens could have prevented his death as well by not letting him drive three times the legal limit. Many people caused this tragedy, the blame can't all fall on the police. Again, losing a friend, a brother, a son, is difficult.. my prayers are with you all during this difficult time.

Leave a comment

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • Kim Tanksley: My friend drove on private land on a dirt racetrack. read more
  • Bart Turnipseed: Just one day a year, thats all I asking for. read more
  • masta j: you bring up very good points. the article makes it read more
  • Brian Murray: Maybe the police should have voice activated weapons that only read more
  • Kim Tanksley: Well "masta j" I was not there was I? I read more
  • Scot: Brian, I was be being very real. My question was: read more
  • RichardN: I have another viewpoint on a police 'board'. Have a read more
  • masta j: given the same situation you would have shot him too??? read more
  • Brian Murray: Three or more dead policeman in Pittsburgh last night that read more
  • Kim Tanksley: A policeman makes a traffic stop for something as innocent read more

Recent Photos

  • Gay Marriage.jpg
  • Kardashian Sisters.jpg
  • polling place.jpg
  • Underground Garden.jpg
  • KFC Oprah Coupon.jpg
  • Kemp.jpg
  • Newsom.jpg
  • fresnoImage.jpg
  • fresnoImage.gif
  • Specter.jpg

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lisa Maria Boyles published on March 30, 2009 8:14 AM.

State sales tax goes up a penny on Wednesday was the previous entry in this blog.

Liquidator is top Gottschalks bidder is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.