Ground-water permits in California?
The state Legislative Analyst's Office last week suggested California should require permits for people who pump water out of the ground -- noting this is one of the few Western states without such a requirement.
It's a touchy subject, especially in the San Joaquin Valley farm belt. Growers and many land owners know that government regulation often adds costs to their businesses.
Many have told me ground-water regulation is unnecessary. Let the water districts and other local authorities manage the underground water table, they say.
The analyst's office, which has been advising state lawmakers for 65 years, says California needs to better coordinate its water system as the state grows.
Water quality and supply problems during the past three dry years have created more pressure on the underground water supplies. People pump more water from the underground when there is less river water to use.
So does it make sense to have a ground-water permit system that tracks water pumping and usage?

Comments:
I really think California as a State has taken the lead on many social issues and I believe it will continue to do so many years into the future. What I find disturbing as a culture and a society we Californian’s and American’s drop the ball when comes to caring for our own. Now this commentary will focus on water pumping permits, but I feel there is a larger big picture; and that would be natural resource extraction fees that are not being paid or very little is being paid to California and Californians. So as not to just beat up on the poor subsidized corporate farmers, let’s look at the so called “Water Banks” either are privately held or controlled by private for profit Delaware Corporations (to avoid paying California’s higher corporate taxes). Now these corporate controlled or dominated agencies and districts that store the public’s water underground for the corporate dominated water districts exchange and sell the public’s water as if it was their asset, it is not, but is bought and sold paying little or no tax revenues. I think this would be a good starting place to require pumping permits and extraction fees.
Now once again this opinion or commentary is not just to pick on the beleaguered corporate farmer; family Inc. or otherwise. Let’s really start taking a hard look at natural resource extracting companies to see if they are paying their fair share in taxes to Californians in proportion the corporation’s return on investment; and maybe we could extract more social responsibility from them for the people in the State of California whose resources they are exploiting, i.e. (water, gold, oil, lumber, war industries, etc).
Posted by: Dave at March 31, 2010 1:32 PM
Post a comment
(read the comment policy before posting)