THEATER REVIEW: ‘Picnic’
The issue of race floats lazily over the new Fresno State production of “Picnic” — not in an oppressive way but in a fresh, vital manner that makes this classic play resonate just a little differently than if it were done with white actors in all the leading roles.
Thomas-Whit Ellis, who specializes in African-American dramatic literature at the university, often devotes his annual directing slot in the season lineup to plays that speak to race and diversity. With “Picnic,” which has long been a staple of college and community theater productions ever since William Inge wrote it in 1953, he’s opted for a more oblique racial statement. He cast a black actor (Brandin Hamilton) in the pivotal role of Hal Carter, the stormy stranger who pops up in a small Kansas town one day and causes a minor bit of havoc in the life of the pretty Madge Owens (Ashley Hyatt) and her family.
It’s interesting to note how Hal, who is depicted in the text as a cocky, occasionally overbearing, “wrong-side-of-the-tracks” man who got into college on a football scholarship and was never truly accepted by his upper-crust peers, relates to the other characters in the play when he’s depicted by a black actor. Parallels can be drawn with a disadvantaged lower-class white existence: the feeling that Hal isn’t “good enough” romantically for the higher-class Madge; her mother’s worry that he’s too sexually confident; his relegation by his snooty fraternity brothers to a lower social rung because sports got him into college, not brains. All are stereotypes, of course, but it’s easy to extrapolate the vague sense of social unease that the townspeople feel toward Hal into the realm of racial politics as well.
The racial impact is subtle, but I think it helps give this classic production — which still has so much to say about gender roles, in particular — a contemporary sheen.
Hamilton gives a fine, focused performance as Hal, whether he’s scurrying about the stage with bravado or working his romantic charm on the bevy of ladies who coo over him. I liked, in particular, the vulnerability we sense in this brash, pumped-up character. He’s matched in intensity and impact by Hyatt’s well-crafted Madge, who doesn’t so much pine for the thrill of a raucous love affair as ache for a decisive bolt from the straight-and-narrow path that her gender and station in life seem to demand.
Bryttani McGhee handles with aplomb the older role of Helen Potts, the next-door-neighbor who first takes in Hal. I’ve seen McGhee in a variety of roles at Fresno State, and it’s a pleasure to watch her tackle such a different kind of role with such impact. Other strong performers are Jered Hobbs as Madge’s boyfriend, Sarah Lofgren as a husband-seeking boarder and Justin Ringhofer as her reluctant beau.
Izzy Einsidler’s sound design gives the production a lot of punch — I actually thought for a moment that a real car was pulling up to the Owens house — and Ashley Manfredi’s lighting design, playing across Jeff Hunter’s sturdy set, nicely shifted time of day and mood. Kelly Pantzlaff’s costumes slickly evoked the era.
One flaw: I was a little disappointed on opening night in the final moments of the play, which have always for me in the past been absolutely breath-takingly riveting. There’s something about the staging here that seemed rushed and flat.
The intensity of production added a lot, however. And so did Ellis’ interesting approach to race, of course. The issue is very lightly dusted by Ellis on top of Inge’s classic romantic intrigue, but it’s there nonetheless. Best of all, it doesn’t feel heavy-handed, just thought-provoking.
Responses to "THEATER REVIEW: ‘Picnic’"
…and now is the time where Stephen stokes the fires of controversy…
Race relations = important.
Continued debate, discussion, improvement = crucial
But it seems like Thomas Witt-Ellis (who I have a great deal of respect for) spreads his race agenda in a wash over everything he touches…to the point where it becomes a sledgehammer of overload.
You know how there’re one-note people you often try to avoid? You KNOW that girl is just going to talk about her ex ALL the time. You KNOW that guy is just going to talk about work every single second.
Well, you KNOW TW-E is going to add something ‘black’ to every production he does…to the point where it becomes the thing more than that production does. Even tho you claim it’s lightly brushed in this show, it IS the first thing you notice, the first thing you mention, and now has to be a constant in your thoughts about the play.
You note it yourself, it changes the play and the interaction between the characters. While it seems to do so in a positive light (adding a ‘contemporary sheen’), I wonder how Inge would feel about this?
This isn’t Peter Brook making Titania a black woman…that wouldn’t matter, neither here nor there. But TW-E did the black Mikado.
I don’t know, but…were I the playwright, I might mind. The black ‘Glass Menagerie?’ Stanley yelling ‘Stellaaaaa’ played by a black man?
Sometimes, sure…but enough is enough. Lead the debate as a professor, TW-E, and definitely bring more powerful theatre to the Valley, but every single time? I dunno.
Thoughts, Donald?
Mr. Munro…I carefully read over your review and find myself nodding in the affirmative to several of your comments. However, I was very disappointed that you failed to recognize some great performances in favor of other, mediocre ones. For example, your review failed to sufficiently mention the performance of the actress who played Millie Owens. I attended last Sunday’s performance and was impressed enough to deem her as “stellar” and “totally professional”. Other parts deserving recognition at the very least were Flo Owens and even the smaller role of “Bomber”.
Furthermore, to call Sarah Lofgren a strong performer as “Rosemary” does no justice to the rest of the cast. Her insufficient performance was clearly evident in the scene when her character confronts Hal, accusing him of getting Millie drunk. Instead of “stealing she scene” as Rosalind Russell did so ably in the 1955 film adaptation, Ms. Lofgren’s response was flat and unconvincing.
Her poor performance also does a bad job on reinforcing the work of other performers. This obviously occurred in two instances.
First was with the actress who portrayed Flo Owens. The moment when Miss Lofgren is supposed to confront Hal is such a pivotal point in the play because that is the very moment when the tide turns against Hal and the performance moves in a completely new direction just after Flo responds to Rosemary’s accusations. But Miss Lofgren is so unconvincing in her chastising Hal that she makes it almost impossible for the other actress to appear upset at Hal out of fear that she will look ridiculous herself. I feel so bad for that actress because she did such a great job of playing a serious role as the concerned mother but was undone because Ms. Lofgren couldn’t perform.
The second time was when Rosemary is confronted by her beau, which was well-played by Justin Ringhofer. Mr. Ringhofer does such a commanding job when he confronts Rosemary after her tirade but because Ms. Lofgren’s acting is so flat and unconvincing, it makes his performance during this moment in the play, so awkward.
I do not mean to be cruel, but I just can not stand to see great performances by other members of the cast go unrecognized in favor of the one person who did the worst job. How can anyone who appreciates the work of William Inge and Rosalind Russel not say anything?
Stephen has an interesting perspective, but it’s shortsighted. Why shouldn’t a director try to inject some new idea into a play? What’s wrong with a different perspective? The only time this is wrong is when it is done for shock value or in a context that has no textual validity. While the textual validity is flimsy, it isn’t non-existent. I don’t know the director, but I doubt that he made this choice just to further his racial agenda. I thought it was an interesting choice and added another layer to a play we all know and have seen a million times.
I also agree that the actress who played Millie did an excellent job and deserved recognition.
I was disappointed when I heard that Fresno State was doing such an uninspired choice to open their season, but I was pleasantly surprised by the show.
Michael K. is the boyfriend of the actress who played Flo Owens.
I would like to respond to accusations made by “Michael K” in his previous post. Donald Munroe is a very talented theater critique, and i doubt he would miss an outstanding performance which lived up to his standards, and most others who have the first idea about theater and literature. i think you ought not worry about the actors not making a moment for themselves, because truth be told, if they were such fine actors, they would be able to shine brightyly no matter who else was sharing the stage at that moment.
I have seen Sarah Lofgren in numerous works around town, and have enjoyed each one I have attended. She is an excellent actress, and if you truly believe her acting is so terrible, it would interfere with others’ work, you may want to reconsider the high quality you have tagged on the other actors in the production. A true excellent actor will be excellent in any role, any scene, and with any co stars aboard.
First of all, my review did not criticize Mr. Munro in any way. I noted that he did a great job in the review. I just pointed out that I was impressed with other members of the cast too.
I am not related to anyone in the play. I played no favorites with anyone except for the actress who played Mille. I just emjoy theater.
As to “Kim’s” comments, you rave about Sarah Lofgren but still don’t give her co-stars any credit. Don’t assume we are all stupid and can’t tell that you are abviously her friend. I am not saying that she is a bad actress. I just think it is ridiculous to give her more aclaim than the person who played Millie. There’s the truth! and whoever wants to be immature about it, just grow up.
Mrs Potts, Millie, Howard were the high points for me tonight at the closing performance….
Set was beautiful, sound and lighting effective…a great play …
I had the chance of viewing this performance and must say it was a fine show. The set was excellent (as most are at State). Brandon Hamilton, Bryttani McGhee, and Amanda Valdez were the highlights of the night for myself.
The subtext of racism was missed for myself. It was not highlighted enough through actor’s performances which seem to treat him as any member of society. The next point I would like to tackle would be the set. The set was well constructed but poorly utilized. Most of the blocking consisted on the small porch; which was found occupying three actors on a walk way step.
Another aspect of the show which bothered me was the performance of Paulette Alatriste. I don’t mean to bring any performer down as this is a learning experience; although I felt her performance was detrimental to the play as a whole. Most of her moments felt contrived and directed moments. I felt her character lacked honesty within the lines and left me wanting much more for a dramatic conclusion. I will agree with Donald with the last “lack luster” moment of the show.
I don’t know if this show fell short of a “Fresno State Level” show; because of the actors or director. Most of the issues which bothered me, could have been easily fixed with the directing. The show consisted of many different acting styles from a very melodramatic bomber to a honestly portrayed Madge. I will be looking forward to Mr.Ellis’ next production though; to see new ideas put within classic shows.