January 15, 2009

arrow Less believable as a model: Katie Holmes or Victoria Beckham?

I can't think of two women I'd less rather dress/look like than Katie Holmes and Victoria Beckham (oh wait -- Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan. That was easier than I thought.), but apparently Miu Miu and Armani do not share my views on fashion.

So, who are you less likely to buy as a fashion model: Sad Clown Holmes or Stick Figure Beckham?

494x_posh_holmes.jpg

[Source]

12:55 PM | | Comments (7)



Comments:

Since "less believable as a model" usually means "more like a human," I'd be uncomfortable assigning that title to either.

Posted by: kent at January 15, 2009 1:10 PM

*****

Beckam kinda has a Sophia Loren look going on in that picture.

I know that's not the question you asked, but I was just making an observation.

Posted by: Abe Lopez at January 15, 2009 1:11 PM

*****

Good point, Kent.

Posted by: Heather at January 15, 2009 1:15 PM

*****

Ummm, they look the same...

Posted by: brodiemash at January 15, 2009 1:25 PM

*****

I think they both have that twiggy thing going on... UGH!

both are totally alien

Posted by: Renee N at January 15, 2009 2:06 PM

*****

Its weird, they do look the same!

Posted by: MsJoey at January 15, 2009 2:32 PM

*****

I've always thought Katie Holmes was quite
cute...but yeah, in these photos they have a sort of
mean alien robot look (but fashion models sometimes
do douse themselves in that mean alien robot scent for the
pix, right?)---but yeah, Kent's remark up top was pretty much spot on.

Posted by: blake at January 15, 2009 3:08 PM

*****

Post a comment

(read the comment policy before posting)

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Recent Entries

 

Search calendar

What:

When:

Where:

Miles:

Search Movies

Advertisement
Advertisement