Thank you all for your insightful reviews of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." I hope they keep coming. It's a treat to have so many thoughtful fans weigh in with their considerable Harry knowledge.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the movie-review aggregate site, the movie is performing very strongly, with a whopping 89% of critics as of this writing giving the movie a "fresh," or recommended, rating. Does that make it the best reviewed movie of the year? Not necessarily. I've read a few dozen reviews, and many of them strike the same tone as those in the Beehive roundup: some minor quibbles with fidelity to the story, a few issues with too much "goopy romance stuff," some minor disappointment with the emotional impact of a major plot point that occurs at the end. But, generally, many critics found a lot to love about the film, especially the superb special effects and the overall storytelling.
Here's my Bee review, which ran in Wednesday's Life section. (It actually made this afternoon's Top 10 list of most-clicked-upon stories in today's Bee, a rarity for movie reviews. So, go ahead, click and see if it can catch up with "Fresno pizza joint ATM pilfered." Oops, now you'll just look at that story instead.)
If you want to read a contrarian review, check out the musings of the New York Observer's Rex Reed, who calls the film "two and a half hours of paralyzing tedium, featuring another colossal waste of British talent and a plot a real witch couldn't find with a crystal ball."






Recent Comments