April 3, 2009 5:10 PM

Blogger-to-Blogger: A Fast & Furious exchange

fast-and-furious-movie-poster.jpg

I don't know everything. I know where to find hideous fliers, sure -- but car movies are not my specialty at all. Yet I've been quite curious about this "Fast & Furious" movie that opened today. So I sought help earlier this week from a Fresno blogger, one Brodiemash, whom I knew could answer my questions. (p.s. Donald has a pretty funny review on the movie in The Bee).

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1

Dear Brodiemash...
As a man who likes both movies and speedy cars, I'm hoping you can help me with something. I'm dumbfounded by this upcoming "Fast & Furious" movie. Is it a sequel? Prequel? Spin-off? Remake? Start over for the franchise?

I've never seen any of these movies and I won't see this one, but I'm curious. To me, it's sort of like putting out a movie called "Back Future" after the first three "Back to the Future" movies.

Please advise.

Yours,
Mike Oz




Mike,
Thanks for asking such questions regarding such a powerful film franchise such as The Fast And The Furious. This week's release of of the fourth installment in the series, cleverly entitled Fast & Furious, has confused many people, even more so with the return of most of the cast from the first film so I'll be glad to guide you through the mythology from what I know (I have yet to see the new film).

This new story continues the adventures of the original cast but doesn't take place immediately after the end of the first film. Chronologically, 2 Fast 2 Furious continued the adventures of Brian O'Connor (Paul Walker) after the first film & teamed him up with Tyrese (who is rumored to have a cameo in this new film). Next came TFATF: Tokyo Drift and featured not a soul from the original cast, although (spoiler alert) Dominick Toretto (Vin Diesel) did make a quick cameo at the very end of the film to keep it within the same universe. Rumors are that Tokyo Drift actually takes place before the new film.

So that's the jist of this whole charade so far. The film franchise is just another excuse for us to see fast cars defying the laws of physics, women doing things we'd never see real women do and to show how buff Vin Diesel looks in a white T-Shirt and is mostly nothing we haven't seen before (The original film borrows heavily from Point Break). Popcorn cinema at it's best so I'll be there this Thursday at midnight with my brain turned off, my nostalgia compass tuned into the year 2001 and my car lust set to "High".




Mr. Mash:
Thank you for the quick reply and thorough explanation.

There's one detail I'm still sort of hung up on -- Vin Diesel was once sort of what people might call a "bad ass," correct? Yet didn't he get replaced by The Rock in Disney movies? Are viewers supposed to believe that Vin Diesel is once again "cool" and a "bad ass?" Is that the crux of the film?

Further, I regret to inform you that I will not, as noted in my previous correspondence, be attending this a showing of this movie at midnight. I do, however, wish you and your popcorn the utmost best in cinema-going.

Warm Regards,
Michael




Mike,
Oh how the mighty have fallen indeed. Vinny has been making some questionable movies as of late. Although The Pacifier did indeed make a nice dent in the box office when it was released, his action/sci-fi films have been sucking much ass. Pitch Black was actually a good film but the sequel, Chronicles Of Riddick, was horrible and was considered a box office flop. xXx made money but decided to go else where when director Rob Cohen wasn't going to be involved with the sequel. And from there it just went down hill. Yes, Diesel's badassery does indeed play a central role in this carsploitation film (and from the reviews so far, it seems like he's back to true form) but it's only a piece of the puzzle.

FF4_T2_(0.01.39.14).jpg_rgb.JPG

Honestly, dude can do sh***y movies from now on or win an Oscar for one of his films (remember, this is the guy Spielberg hand picked for Saving Private Ryan after seeing his short film), he will forever be Dom Toretto to me. As long as he does that role good, I could care less. Now will the audience feel the same way? Who knows. All I do know is that the first two films opened at #1 & the third at #3 at the box office. The original is now considered a classic among the car enthusiasts, even though it pretty much destroyed the underground scene across the country (something I will be writing about this week on Dumb Drum) which most saw as a good thing. It definitely has a built in audience and I don't think the pussyfing of Vin Diesel will keep them away. And those people will be back to see the further adventures of the original gang. At least I think they will but it will be an interesting weekend, nonetheless.

-brodiemash




FRIDAY, APRIL 3

Mr. Mash:
So, might I ask, what did you think of the film?




It turned out to be what I expected for the most part: Horrible dialogue, pretty cars & some decent action set pieces. This entry into the franchise isn't going to be on very many car enthusiasts greatest car movies of all time, which is really the only thing the people responsible for creating could aspire to create without risking turning the built in audience into an angry mob and sinking the franchise. And judging from the crowds at the screening (three screens and they all seemed to be VERY packed) and the burnouts in the parking lot afterwards, this franchise is here to stay. For my full review, head on over here. The Dumb Are Mostly Intrigued By The Drum.

-brodiemash

12 Comments

LOVE this format, blogger to blogger.

The lost and the formerous Will A. tried this years ago, but his subject of choice then railed an entire novel (seriously, 50,000 words...I'm still dumbfounded) at us.

This quick back and forth along with actual humor AND educational entertainment?

Give me more.

Steph, does that interview still bother you that much??

Good.

For the record?
Will interviewed at least one other Blogger (Joy M.)
and I think? Marcel? too? (Marcel, please forgive the cloudiness on this, no offense intended, heavy semester.)

There may have been other bloggers interviewed,
And the point of the interviews (to my understanding,) was:
-to find who the bloggers were,
-what they cared about,
-why they blogged,
-and how they interracted with Fresno (town/individuals)
--and
we were given full license and freedom in the response.
(Pretty gutsy, on his behalf, not the easiest thing to do from this side, either.)
When initially approached?
I was baffled, but he stated that, 'despite folks comments good or bad, I just still 'kept at it,' (and folks genuninely had strong feelings about this (good and bad,) --and that phenomena was genuinely interesting to him'
(apparently others too.) -So we did it.
It was honoring, humbling, and pretty sobering, (and a little scarey.)
I owe him for the trust alone.

It's too bad the series didn't go further,

I genuinely enjoyed folks openning up about themselves, feel it's an angle of bringing the community to itself that others may not understand (nor know how to do.)
Will has an excellent way at really revealing the honesty of a situation or person, and knows how to capture it, it's a bit of a rare thing.

This (seems more) like Mike asking another Blogger to chime in on a seperate issue.
(Good review, BrodieMash, by the way.)

I loved 'Fast and Furious' (mostly for the Mopar, (but) I thought 2F2F tried too hard (second half,)with attempting too much of a plot, and it played too much like 'Miami Vice' (with more Year One advertising than a copy of Hot Rod.)
-though it was nice to see Yenko's sorta represented...
(A Motion Baldwin would have been even more interesting.)

This time? I dunno.
I'm not wild about this model year of Chevelle, (I prefer 66-69's) and have personal angst about seeing a Fish-Mouth Torino get crunched, (I'm a Ford man.)

...and I completely don't remember Diesel in Saving Private Ryan... (my bad.)
(Good film, but it didn't really hit me.
-Schindlers List, (however) I think needs to be seen every few years.

PS:
--you may want to fix the link to Dumb/Drum --they moved to a different site address, (it does automatically redirect,) --but it's not smooth...
And we all know the 'hive is all about smooth.

i suspect Vin Diesel's gravelly voice and chicks are the main selling point for Fast and Furious 1-4

http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=402575>1=28101

$72 million, good enough for first place at the box office. wooooohooooo!!

My goodness. The sexual tension between these two bloggers is off the charts.

@Heather: Don't hate on the bromance flow, sir!

@wet towel: Thanks you for the kind words & the heads up on the broken link. I'm sure the Beehive code monkeys will be hard at work to fix that for us.....right?

@mdub420: Yup, $72 million. I figured that people were going to come out in droves but that number was insane! The best opening ever for Universal can only mean we'll be getting more of these in the future.

I love me some big screen Vin and Paul... yum!

The film is like a male version of Sex and the City. How cute.

...male version of Sex and the City?
WHAT?

(well.)

Hmmmm,,,,
Kristin Davis or a GNX, Kristin Davis or a GNX...Kristin Davis or...
(I really need to think about this one for a minute... I'll get back to ya.)

I've updated the address to The Dumb Drum. It'll take a bit to show up on all the pages.

Leave a comment

Recent Comments

Blog Archive

June
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30