Does anyone care?
Do you think Michael Jackson will actually perform? Maybe he saw Britney Spears kick off her comeback tour this week and thought: "Geez, if she can do it, damn, anybody can do it."
Jackson today announced he will perform in 10 concerts scheduled for London in July. He swears these will be the final shows of his career. Tickets are going to cost $70-$150 (um, that's in American dollars and not British pounds, in case anyone plans to fly over there and catch these shows).
But, I'm sorry, I'm really skeptical that he will pull off any or all of these concerts. The guy was more than 90 minutes late to his own news conference to make an announcement that lasted only three minutes. Doesn't he seem frail and, well, just not all that interested?
The part that cracks me up is the sign he had at the dais today. It included "King of Pop," as if that title still mattered to anybody. So why am I blogging this? Because it's so-o-o-o amusing. Hee-hee.
[Photo: Whitby/Getty]
This guy is beyond delusional. It's almost sad, really.
Not ALMOST Heather, he IS delusional.
The saddest part, he has offspring.
-the guy needs to be convicted of his crimes,
left to rot in a third world jail,
and the financial proceeds of his work go towards foster care facilities and programs specifically that help sexually abused children.
-when He finally is killed/dies?
Vital organs (such as his brain) need to be studied to see if there is anything physiologically different that would tip us off to see if there is any organic structural predisposition among sex offenders of this nature.
Once the data collected? the tissues incinerated and then scattered on a pile of pig feces,
-what is not studied?
left somewhere in a shallow unmarked grave.
-and that's me being nice about how I feel about this guy.
To MS Joey,
What I'm about to say I don't mean in too much negativity towards you. My first question is, Do you realize that the News Media can say whatever they want (and I'm not a "media conspiracy theorist" but it is a business where headlines come before truth. I really am going to ask you first to read the court transcripts and Legal NOT MEDIA transcripts from the first case back in '93. If you do honestly email me back. The kid never admitted that Michael did anything and there was NEVER any evidence according to court transcripts. Michael did go through the legal process first and 7 grand jury's would not let the case go to court based on the fact that the child said Michael never did anything and there was no evidence. Thats why the father was only trying to sue and extort. Get your facts, honestly. Not major new media. Court transcript fact. Also The boys father met with Michael and his lawyers before going to authorities, telling him what he was set to accuse him with unless Michael paid him. Michael said he would not pay him because it didn't happen and he would rather take legal action. Michael paid him (and not the amount reported because it is undisclosed) after 7 grand jury's wouldn't send it to court; because of the media frenzy and the constant appeals over and over he wanted it to stop and his lawyers suggested that he pay an amount that he wouldn't miss and that they would accept. From a legal aspect. The state was going after Michael "Criminally" not the father and there was no witness or evidence to win that. The Father only wanted money and he got the money to leave him alone. The second case, is obvious extortion. They used the same psychatrist, DA, Investigator as the first guy and started hiring these folks before they even said anything happened to the boy. They hired them as soon as michael said you can't keep mooching off of me. PLease check you facts. You don't have to like mj, his music his clothes, his face him at all. but FActs are facts and the media is comprised of several companies...... they don't have to tell the truth, especially when they know people won't check the facts.... people like you.